Comparison
PrintNow vs Infigo
A side-by-side comparison of two web-to-print platforms — pricing, free trial, platform architecture, true-cost estimating, packaging CAD, and trade-print reach — so you can pick the right fit for your print shop.
Facts verified from each vendor’s own site and public sources, July 2026.
The short version
Which one is right for you?
Both are capable web-to-print platforms. PrintNow pulls ahead on transparent pricing, a proprietary unified platform, true-cost estimating, and structural packaging; Infigo is an established commercial-print platform with a long track record on the nopCommerce ecosystem.
Choose PrintNow if…
- You want transparent published pricing with $0 setup, support included, and a no-credit-card trial — not a quote after a demo.
- You want a true-cost manufacturing pricing engine that prices from real production inputs, not just markups.
- You sell (or plan to sell) structural packaging and need true parametric dielines, not template-based packaging.
- You route orders to trade printers and want a large set of trade-print network connections (100+).
- You'd rather have one proprietary, unified platform (storefront + Unified Admin) than a storefront layered on a third-party framework.
Choose Infigo if…
- You want an established UK-based platform with a long commercial-print track record (customers include Fujifilm and HP).
- You're comfortable in the nopCommerce / .NET ecosystem and value its plugin marketplace.
- MegaEdit and the Invent InDesign workflow fit how your design team already works.
- You prefer a guided, demo-first evaluation over a self-serve trial.
This comparison is published by PrintNow. We’ve kept the facts sourced from each vendor’s own site — verify current details directly with Infigo before you decide.
Head to head
PrintNow vs Infigo, feature by feature
Both platforms hit the web-to-print essentials, so parity is common. The real differences show up in architecture, pricing, true-cost estimating, packaging, and trade-print reach.
| Capability | PrintNow | Infigo |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing (true-cost) pricing engine* | ||
| Parametric packaging CAD (dielines)* | ||
| Proprietary storefront platform* | ||
| Trade-print network integrations* | 100+ | |
| Monthly pricing | From $495–2,500/mo | Quote only |
| Setup fee | $0 | Quote |
| Support included (not quoted) | ||
| Free trial (no credit card)* | ||
| Live design preview | ||
| Online design editor | ||
| AI content & image tools | ||
| 3D product preview | ||
| B2B & B2C storefronts | ||
| Instant / dynamic pricing engine | ||
| Production workflow automation | ||
| Prebuilt integrations | 140+ | 25+ |
| REST API & webhooks | ||
| Cloud hosting | Microsoft Azure | Cloud SaaS |
* PrintNow prices from real production inputs — materials, labor, waste, and equipment. Based on Infigo's published materials, we found no equivalent true-cost manufacturing engine.
* PrintNow's Print CAD generates true structural dielines parametrically. Infigo serves the packaging vertical through templates rather than a parametric CAD engine.
* PrintNow runs a proprietary storefront with its own Unified Admin, built and updated as one system. Infigo is built on the nopCommerce (ASP.NET) framework, per nopCommerce's own partner listing.
* Direct connections into trade-print fulfillment networks (e.g. 4over, Sinalite). PrintNow publishes 100+; Infigo publishes no trade-print network connectors.
* PrintNow offers a self-serve 14-day trial of the Growth plan with no credit card. Infigo is demo-first — pricing is disclosed after a demo.
Where it matters
The four decisions that separate them
Checkmarks show parity; the nuance lives in how each platform approaches the areas below. Here’s an honest read on each.
Architecture
A proprietary unified platform vs a nopCommerce build
Runs its own proprietary storefront and Unified Admin, built and updated as one system — so storefronts, editor, pricing, and production share a single data model and a single vendor accountable for the whole stack.
Built on the nopCommerce (ASP.NET) open-source framework. That brings a plugin ecosystem, but it also ties parts of the stack to the framework's conventions and roadmap.
Bottom line: If you want one vendor owning the entire stack end to end, PrintNow's proprietary platform is the tighter fit. If you specifically value the nopCommerce ecosystem, Infigo leans into it.
Estimating
True-cost manufacturing engine vs markup pricing
Prices from real manufacturing inputs — stock, labor, waste, and equipment — so the storefront price reflects actual production cost and protects margin on complex jobs.
Offers instant pricing and quoting driven by rules and markups. We found no evidence of a true-cost manufacturing engine.
Bottom line: For shops that own production and quote non-standard work, true-cost estimating is the differentiator. For standard catalog products, both handle instant pricing.
Packaging & product range
Parametric CAD and a wide catalog vs standard products
Print CAD generates true structural dielines parametrically, and the catalog spans small- and large-format, apparel and promo, and structural packaging with 3D and live preview.
Serves commercial print and a packaging vertical with a capable editor, but through templates and standard product setups rather than a parametric CAD engine.
Bottom line: For custom or structural packaging and a broad product range, parametric CAD is the differentiator. For established commercial-print catalogs, both are strong.
Pricing & buying
Transparent, all-in vs quote-after-demo
Publishes tiered pricing ($495–2,500/mo) with $0 setup, support included, and a self-serve 14-day free trial (no credit card).
Uses quote-based pricing disclosed after a demo, so you book a call before you can compare cost.
Bottom line: If you want to compare cost and test the product before talking to sales, PrintNow removes the gate. If you prefer a guided evaluation, Infigo's demo-first model fits.